Method Profile

Compartment-Specific Signaling and Function in DCM Patient-Derived Cardiomyocytes

Four donor-derived cardiac cell lines support parallel GPCR signaling, calcium, extracellular electrical and impedance measurements.

HeartHuman Cell Assays
Exterior view of the McGill University Health Centre Glen site, showing hospital buildings and landscaped grounds.
McGill University Health Centre’s Glen site, photographed in 2022. (Jeangagnon, CC BY-SA 4.0)

Research Applications

Explore individual pharmacological response profiles and test how molecular signaling relates to functional cardiac-cell behavior.

Model & Design

One induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cardiomyocyte line from each of two healthy controls and two patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Experimental Format

Nuclear/cytoplasmic PKA and ERK biosensors, spontaneous calcium imaging and separate extracellular field-potential/1-Hz-paced impedance measurements before and after ligands.

Model Components

  • Component

    Human cells

    Description

    Four blood-derived iPSC lines validated for pluripotency, karyotype and cardiomyocyte identity; approximately 85% cardiomyocyte purity with the reported differentiation.

  • Component

    Pharmacological probes

    Description

    Angiotensin, adrenergic and endothelin-receptor ligands; key functional comparisons include 10 μM isoproterenol, phenylephrine and endothelin-1 dose responses.

  • Component

    Measurements

    Description

    Compartment-targeted PKA/ERK reporters, myofilament-localized RGECO-TnT calcium reporter, extracellular field potentials and impedance.

Measurements & Endpoints

  • Nuclear/cytoplasmic PKA and ERK response
  • Single-cell response-cluster proportions
  • Calcium transient frequency/amplitude
  • Field-potential amplitude/duration
  • Impedance amplitude and kinetics

Analysis

Compare each donor’s signaling and functional endpoints separately, retaining the distinction between spontaneously measured calcium events and 1-Hz-paced impedance; impedance amplitude is not absolute contractile force.

Published Evidence

  • Study Design

    Compare baseline and ligand-stimulated molecular/function profiles across the four donor cell lines.

    Study Sample

    Two control donors and two DCM patients, one line per donor; signaling plates, cells and recording wells provide assay-level replication.

    Comparison

    Matched vehicle or pretreatment baseline within each line and the corresponding other donor lines.

    Finding

    One patient line showed elevated phenylephrine-associated cytosolic PKA without a corresponding dose-dependent beat-rate/impedance increase. A second patient line showed little isoproterenol frequency response in calcium imaging but an increase in field-potential recordings.

    Interpretation & Limits
    • Different assay stimulation conditions may contribute to cross-measurement differences.
    • Four donors do not define a DCM population response or validate individual clinical drug selection.
    • Several functional amplitudes did not change significantly after isoproterenol.

Sources

  1. Evaluating and comparing the signalling and functional landscape of hiPSC-CMs derived from patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. npj Biomedical Innovations. 2026. DOI: 10.1038/s44385-026-00111-8 ↗