Method Profile

Genome-Edited Caco-2–HepG2 Chip for Integrated Drug Absorption and Metabolism

Measure parent compounds and selected metabolites across a human engineered intestinal barrier–liver cell-line chip, including CYP3A4 inhibitor challenges.

LiverOrgan Chips
Road and medical-campus buildings at the former Tokyo Medical and Dental University, now part of the Institute of Science Tokyo.
The former Tokyo Medical and Dental University campus, now part of the Institute of Science Tokyo, photographed in November 2024. (Kakidai, CC BY-SA 4.0)

Research Applications

Investigate coupled intestinal drug transfer, metabolic activity and specific drug–drug or compound-level drug–food interactions.

Model & Design

Genome-edited human Caco-2 cells in the upper channel and CYPs-UGT1A1 knock-in human HepG2 cells in the lower channel; wild-type matched cell-line chip as comparator.

Experimental Format

Two-channel PDMS device; 14-day model formation, with rocking at 0.1 cycle/min applied only during absorption/metabolism assays; upper/lower sampling at 2, 4, 24 and 48 hours.

Model Components

  • Component

    Engineered and wild-type cell pairs

    Description

    Caco-2 barrier and HepG2 aggregates; Lucifer yellow permeability and marker characterization; no primary tissue or donor-diverse cohort.

  • Component

    Drug and material controls

    Description

    Six parent drugs and selected CYP metabolites measured by LC–MS/MS; separate PDMS/polystyrene sorption checks. Itraconazole or bergamottin at 10 μM before exposure to 10 μM triazolam.

Measurements & Endpoints

  • Barrier permeability
  • Parent-drug concentrations in both channels
  • Selected CYP metabolite concentrations
  • Compound sorption to device material

Analysis

Compare genome-edited versus wild-type chips and static versus rocking conditions. Interpret parent disappearance with measured metabolite formation and separate material losses; reported error bars are SD.

Published Evidence

  • Study Design

    Six-drug absorption/metabolism comparison plus CYP3A4 inhibitor challenge.

    Study Sample

    Characterization n = 3 devices; drug profiles n = 4 devices; inhibitor challenge n = 3 devices.

    Comparison

    Wild-type chip, static conditions, no-inhibitor control and material-only sorption controls.

    Finding

    Edited chips produced higher selected CYP metabolites. Itraconazole and bergamottin raised triazolam and lowered α-hydroxytriazolam at 24 and 48 hours in both channels. Lower-channel diclofenac did not significantly differ between edited and wild-type chips despite metabolite differences.

    Interpretation & Limits
    • Established engineered cell lines differ from primary tissues.
    • Bidirectional rocking occurred only during assays.
    • PDMS sorption confounds parent loss and metabolite recovery.
    • The 48-hour assay and 0.22 cm² surface were not validated for rapid first-pass scaling.
    • Unstable 4-hydroxypropranolol was not quantified.

Sources

  1. Genome edited intestine liver on a chip system for integrated intestinal hepatic drug absorption and metabolism evaluation. Scientific Reports. 2025-11-04. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-22425-0. ↗