Method Profile

Preprint: Sacituzumab Govitecan Delivery and Sensitivity in a TNBC QSP Model

A two-clone tumor model links ADC and free-payload disposition with tumor–immune dynamics, using trial-response data to constrain virtual cohorts.

Tumor ModelsComputational Models
A tree-lined road and brick buildings on Johns Hopkins University’s Homewood campus.
Johns Hopkins University’s Homewood campus in Baltimore, photographed in 2023. (Chris Rycroft, CC BY 2.0)

Research Applications

Interrogate how antigen-linked delivery, systemically released SN-38 and intrinsic payload sensitivity contribute under the model assumptions.

Model & Design

Four-compartment TNBC QSP model with antigen-high and antigen-low clones whose SN-38 sensitivities also differ.

Experimental Format

Simulate sacituzumab govitecan at 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle; sample 34 parameters and compare cohort response categories.

Model Components

  • Component

    Pharmacology and clone inputs

    Description

    Published sacituzumab govitecan/SN-38 disposition and response data; TROP2-high/low clone-specific potency and cytotoxicity assumptions.

  • Component

    Clinical references

    Description

    Phase I/II basket-trial response categories for calibration and ASCENT categories for a separate comparison.

Measurements & Endpoints

  • Objective response and stable/progressive disease proportions
  • Intracellular SN-38 exposure by modeled delivery route
  • Tumor volume and clone composition
  • Parameter sensitivity

Analysis

Separate antigen expression from its modeled covariation with payload sensitivity; compare free-payload transport enabled versus disabled rather than attributing a correlation to targeted delivery.

Published Evidence

  • Study Design

    Calibrate virtual response categories, compare a distinct phase III dataset without recalibration, then perturb payload transport and clone fractions.

    Study Sample

    400 initial calibration virtual patients; 244 evaluable virtual patients for comparison confidence intervals; 1,200 starting virtual patients for later stability-based sensitivity analyses, subject to initial tumor-size exclusion.

    Comparison

    Published phase I/II and ASCENT response categories; matched model simulations with and without plasma-to-tumor free SN-38 permeability.

    Finding

    Predicted partial/complete response 33.2% versus clinical 34.0%; stable disease 38.5% versus 39.3%; progressive disease 28.3% versus 26.6%. Targeted delivery alone contributes approximately 2.4%/0.4% of total intracellular exposure in high/low clones under this model.

    Interpretation & Limits
    • The source is a preprint, and the clinical comparison is at cohort level.
    • Clone antigen abundance and payload sensitivity covary; the modeled exposure fractions do not generalize to every ADC.
    • Payload effects on immune cells, acquired resistance, new lesions and intracellular glucuronidation are omitted.

Sources

  1. Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model for TROP-2 Targeted Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. bioRxiv. 2026-09-25. DOI: 10.64898/2026.09.20.752985 ↗