Preprint Evoked-Response Decoding in Human Cortical Organoids
Microelectrode-array stimulation and offline decoding quantify separability of evoked cortical-organoid responses under neural inhibitors and disease-related perturbations.
Add a network-level functional endpoint to neural pharmacology and disease-model comparisons.
Model & Design
Human stem-cell-derived cortical organoids, including a familial-Alzheimer’s APP-duplication induced-pluripotent-stem-cell (iPSC) line and a healthy-donor iPSC comparator.
Experimental Format
Three reported spatial stimulation patterns, repeated microelectrode-array (MEA) recording and logistic-regression decoding; spontaneous activity and connectivity measured alongside evoked responses.
Model Components
Component
Neural tissues
Description
Human embryonic-stem-cell and iPSC resources; two-to-four-month developmental comparisons. APP and healthy-donor organoids compared at three months.
Component
Pharmacological perturbations
Description
Twenty-minute exposures: NMDA and AMPA/kainate receptor antagonists AP5/CNQX at 25 μM each, bicuculline at 20 μM and tetrodotoxin (TTX) at 1 μM in the reported comparisons.
Component
Recording and decoder
Description
MEA surface contact, three spatial patterns with thirty trials each, top twenty active channels, ten-millisecond bins, initial ten-millisecond artifact exclusion and a 2:1 recording-level train/test split.
Measurements & Endpoints
Offline pattern-classification accuracy
Pattern dissimilarity
Spontaneous mean firing rate
Functional connectivity/global efficiency
Amyloid staining in the APP comparison
Analysis
Interpret accuracy as the ability of the offline classifier to separate recorded evoked patterns. Link inhibitor effects to firing and connectivity without equating trial-level test data with independent donor/organoid prediction.
Published Evidence
Study Design
Measure response classification before and after neural inhibitors.
Study Sample
Figure 3: five organoids across three independent experiments.
Comparison
Baseline versus twenty-minute AP5/CNQX, bicuculline or TTX exposure.
Finding
Accuracy changed from 89% to 55.5%, 88.5% to 78% and 85.5% to 32.5%, respectively. Bicuculline increased firing despite reduced accuracy; TTX eliminated activity/connectivity.
Interpretation & Limits
Results describe four-month drug-tested tissues, Methods three-month tissues; exact pharmacological subset age is unresolved.
Methods mentions four stimulus patterns while Results/figures report three classes; stated accuracy values refer to the reported three-class experiments.
Surface recording and a within-recording split do not validate generalization to a held-out donor/organoid.
Study Design
Compare APP-duplication and healthy-donor cortical organoids.
Study Sample
Functional n = 15 organoids and amyloid n = 6, each from three experiments.
Comparison
Three-month patient-derived APP versus healthy-donor organoids.
Finding
APP organoids had more amyloid and reduced accuracy/dissimilarity despite similar spontaneous firing and global efficiency.
Interpretation & Limits
Donor backgrounds differ; this is not an isogenic comparison.
These network measurements are not clinical cognition.
Brainopheno combines electrical stimulation, microelectrode recordings and an offline decoder to measure response separability in human cortical organoids. Neural inhibitors reduced classification accuracy, while disease and monocyte comparisons revealed changes missed by some spontaneous-activity measures.