Keep simulated oxygen separate from direct measurements and identify the actual platform used for each biological endpoint.
Published Evidence
Study Design
Compare injury across materials and CDDO responses between inserts and PET chips under the same nominal 1% oxygen condition.
Study Sample
One immortalized human proximal-tubule line; at least three independent injury/drug experiments.
Comparison
In-air controls, PET/PDMS materials, static inserts and injured cultures without CDDO.
Finding
PDMS cultures showed little corresponding injury while PET chips developed marked viability loss. CDDO significantly improved insert viability at 100 nM; PET showed an improving trend up to 1 μM, with higher-concentration toxicity in both systems.
Interpretation & Limits
Oxygen estimates were not validated by direct in-chip sensing.
CDDO was evaluated at one oxygen-deprivation setting.
Gene-expression results came from inserts; severe PET injury limited RNA harvest.
The cell line and limited functional endpoints constrain physiological coverage.
Matched-geometry chips made from PET or PDMS produced different injury patterns under the same nominal oxygen conditions. Simulations and human proximal-tubule experiments linked platform oxygen transport with the observed drug response.